Why Fate is Not Popular

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Oleg Maltsev

Abstract

In this paper, the author proposes a praxeological and epistemological reflection on the issue of why the phenomenon of "fate" has lost popularity in the 21st century, particularly in our current times. First and foremost, the very question itself is critically examined and empirically researched. The historical and socio-cultural preconditions for the genesis of the perception of the construct "fate" and its individual elements are reviewed. One of the practical innovations and discoveries presented in this scientific research involves models that provide an understanding of fate as a system, while also addressing a range of practical questions. These questions include how and why people perceive their fate, what the main barriers and "enemies' are that prevent people from learning to control their fate, and how they can realize the future they desire.


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61439/UAKE7898

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biography

Dr. Oleg Maltsev, European Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Oleg Maltsev is an author, scientist, criminologist, psychologist, photographer, and investigative journalist. He is the head of the Memory Institute, named after Grigory Semenovich Popov, and the author of groundbreaking scholarly works in criminology, psychology, and philosophy. He is a presidium member and academic member at the European Academy of Sciences in Ukraine (EUASU). He has been engaged in scholarly work for nearly 30 years and has conducted field research with the Expeditionary Corps of the Memory Institute, for a decade. This comparative international research explores the reasons why different nations and rulers attained power throughout history, with an emphasis on culture, military and scientific technique, and mentality. His recent work in English language is Jean Baudrillard, Maestro: The Last Prophet of Europe co-authored together with Dr. Lucien-Samir Oulahbib.

References

Achtnich, M. (1971). Schicksalsanalytisch orientierte Berufsberatung anhand des Berufsbilder-Wahltestes. Ein Beitrag zur Psychologie der Berufswahl, des Berufswechsels und der Berufsprognose. Bericht über das 5. Kolloquium der Internat. Forschungsgemeinschaft für Schicksalspsychologie, Louvain-Löwen 31. August–3. September 1969. In Szondiana. VIII. Hans Huber.
Amorós, J. E., Cristi, O., & Naudé, W. (2021). Entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Does the motivation to start-up a firm matter? Journal of Business Research, 127, 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.044
Andresen, M., & Stapf, J. (2022). Is career what you make it? A critical review of research on social origin and career success. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.008
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006
Azarbakht, A., Rudman, A. J., & Douglas, J. (2021). A decision-making approach for operational earthquake forecasting. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 66, 102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102591
Beiler, H. (2017). Do you dare? The effect of economic conditions on entrepreneurship among college graduates. Labour Economics, 47, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2017.05.003
Bögel, P. M., & Upham, P. (2018). Role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions studies: Review in relation to consumption and technology acceptance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.002
Bruce, J. R. (2014). Risky business: How social psychology can help improve corporate risk management. Business Horizons, 57(4), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.03.002
Danaher, J., & Hopster, J. (2022). The normative significance of future moral revolutions. Futures, 144, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103046
De Carranza, J. S. (1582). De la Filosofia de las Armas y de su Destreza y la Aggression y Defensa Cristiana [On the Philosophy of Arms and its Skill, and Christian Offense and Defense]. https://archive.org/details/DeLaFilosofiaDeLasArmasYDeSuDestrezaYLaAggressionYDefensaCristiana/mode/2up
Dumas, A. (1846). The Count of Monte-Cristo. Chapman and Hall.
Durov, V. L. (1924). Dressirovka zhivotnyh. Psihologicheskie nablyudeniya nad zhivotnymi, dressirovannymi po moemu metodu (40 letnij opyt). Novoe v zoopsihologii [Animal training: psychological observations on animals trained according to my method (40-year experience). New in zoopsychology]. Universalnoe izdatelstvo.
Durov, V. L. (1937). My Circus Animals (1st ed.). George Routledge & Sons Ltd.
Eom, S., Oh, B., Shin, S., & Lee, K. (2021). Multi-task learning for spatial events prediction from social data. Information Sciences, 581, 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.049
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. Penguin.
Gilbey, A., Walmsley, S., Tani, K., & Reweti, S. (2021). Decision making dyads and judgement overconfidence: Implications for high-risk industries. Applied Ergonomics, 97, 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103529
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
Jung, K. G. (1943). Psychologie des Unbewussten [Psychology of the Unconscious]. Rascher Verlag.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin UK.
Kim, M. J., Park, B., & Young, L. (2020). The Psychology of Motivated versus Rational Impression Updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001
Kirwan, G. (2015). Psychology and security. In The Cloud Security Ecosystem (pp. 269–281). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801595-7.00013-6
Koichu, B., Schwarz, B. B., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M., & Yarden, A. (2022). Design practices and principles for promoting dialogic argumentation via interdisciplinarity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 37, 100657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100657
Kolade, O., & Owoseni, A. (2022). Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technology in Society, 71, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102086
Levy-Bruhl, L. (1936). Primitives and the Supernatural (L. A. Clare, Trans.). G. Allen. (Original work published 1931)
Lisciandra, C. (2018). The role of psychology in behavioral economics: The case of social preferences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 72, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.010
Mangnus, A., Oomen, J., Vervoort, J., & Hajer, M. (2021). Futures literacy and the diversity of the future. Futures, 132, 102793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102793
Maltsev, O. V. (2018). The Age-Old Deceiving. Serednyak T. K. https://books.google.com.ua/books?vid=ISBN6177696635
Maund, P. R., Irvine, K. N., Lawson, B., Steadman, J., Risely, K., Cunningham, A. A., & Davies, Z. G. (2020). What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects. Biological Conservation, 246, 108587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587
Métayer, D. L., Bossuet, M., Coudert, F., Gayrel, C., Jaime, F., Jouvray, C., Kung, A., Ma, Z., & Maña, A. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in practice: Challenges and benefits for privacy research. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(6), 864–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.020
Moirano, R., Sánchez, M. A., & Stepanek, L. (2020). Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100626
Schildkraut, J., Gruenewald, J., Gilliam, M., & Novak, M. (2021). Framing mass shootings as a social problem: A comparison of ideologically and non-ideologically motivated attacks. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 60, 101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101533
Senftleben, U., Schoemann, M., Schwenke, D., Richter, S., Dshemuchadse, M., & Scherbaum, S. (2019). Choice perseveration in value-based decision making: The impact of inter-trial interval and mood. Acta Psychologica, 198, 102876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102876
Silberer, H. (1970). Problems of Mysticism and Its Symbolism. S. Weiser.
Sools, A. M., De Groot, I., Coppers, J., & Triliva, S. (2022). Young people’s situated capacity to imagine a desired post-pandemic future: A qualitative methodology for assessing futures consciousness. Futures, 144, 103045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103045
Stanislavski, C. (2013). An Actor Prepares. A&C Black. (Original work published 1935)
Stephan, U., Tavares, S. M., Carvalho, H., Ramalho, J. J., Santos, S. C., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2020). Self-employment and eudaimonic well-being: Energized by meaning, enabled by societal legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106047
Szondi, L. (1944). Schicksalsanalyse [Fate-Analysis]. Schwabe.
Szondi, L. (1947). Experimentelle Triebdiagnostik [Experimental diagnosis of drives]. Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1952). Triebpathologie [Drive pathology]. Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1956). Ich-Analyse: die Grundlage zur Vereinigung der Tiefenpsychologie [Ego Analysis] (1st ed.). Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1963). Schicksalsanalytische Therapie. Ein Lehrbuch der passiven und aktiven analytischen Psychotherapie [Fate-analytical therapy]. Hans Huber.
Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2021). Decision-making by machines: Is the ‘Law of Everything’ enough? Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105541
Thomas, E. C., Bass, S. B., & Siminoff, L. A. (2021). Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113900
Tversky, A. (2004). Preference, belief, and similarity: Selected Writings (E. Shafir, Ed.). Bradford Books.
Yip, J. A., & Lee, K. K. (2022). Emotions and ethics: How emotions sensitize perceptions of the consequences for self and others to motivate unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101464
Wal, S. K. D. (2022). Sport and exercise psychology and the UN’s sustainable development goals: Reflections and suggestions. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.06.004
Webb, P., Davidson, G., Edge, R., Falls, D., Keenan, F., Kelly, B., McLaughlin, A., Montgomery, L., Mulvenna, C., Norris, B., Owens, A., & Irvine, R. S. (2020). Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 72, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101613
Works by Paul Meyer. (n.d.). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Meyer%2C+Paul%2C+1840-1917%22
Wu, C., Hill, C., & Yan, E. (2017). Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.04.005
Yu, W., Zhu, F., Foo, M., & Wiklund, J. (2022). What does not kill you makes you stronger: Entrepreneurs’ childhood adversity, resilience, and career success. Journal of Business Research, 151, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.035