If you are considering submitting your work to this journal, we advise reviewing the About the Journal page to familiarize yourself with the Review Policy section and Submission Preparation Checklist.

Authors need to register with the journal prior to submitting or, if already registered, can simply log in and begin the five-step process.

 

Article Formatting Requirements:
Authors must comply with the specified formatting requirements when submitting their work.

1. Article Structure
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methodology
- Core Contents (Results / Discussion etc.)
- Conclusion

2. Formatting
- Use a standard academic format APA (7th edition)
- Set font (Garamond, Minion Pro, New York Times), size (12), and spacing (1).

3. Citation and References
- Follow in-text citation and bibliography rules according to the chosen style.
Include all used sources in the bibliography - APA (7th edition)

4. Tables and Figures
- Insert tables and figures with detailed captions.
- Ensure they meet resolution and quality standards.

Publication Cost
There is no fee associated with the publication of articles in our journal. Authors are not required to pay any publication charges, and the process is entirely cost-free.

Review policy

The journal "Newsletter on the results of scholarly work in sociology, criminology, philosophy, and political science" adheres to a double-blind peer review policy. Each article undergoes evaluation by the journal's editor and is subsequently reviewed by experts. Only after successfully passing the double-blind review stage can a manuscript progress to the publication preparation phase.

Should authors disagree with any comments from the reviewers, they have the option to engage in a scientific discussion, providing a scientific rationale for why a particular correction cannot be incorporated into the manuscript.

Throughout the manuscript evaluation, reviewers do not have the right to share the manuscript with third parties, utilize the data presented within, or employ the manuscript in any appropriate manner. If a reviewer believes that additional expert opinions are necessary, they should inform the editor rather than proceeding independently.

In cases where there is a potential conflict of interest during the double-blind review process, authors are required to disclose this at the manuscript submission stage. If a reviewer is unable to provide an impartial evaluation due to financial or non-financial conflicts of interest, they must decline the review and promptly notify the editorial office.

Instances of manipulation of the review process will be examined by the editorial board of the "Newsletter on the results of scholarly work in sociology, criminology, philosophy, and political science" on an individual basis, following the manipulation policy.

Peer Review Process:

Initial Evaluation.
Submissions undergo an initial assessment by the editorial team to ensure adherence to the journal's scope and guidelines. Manuscripts failing to meet these criteria may be returned to authors at this stage.

Peer Review.
Accepted manuscripts proceed to a rigorous double-blind peer review process. Reviewers, who are esteemed members of the editorial board and recognized experts in the specific field, provide constructive feedback to the authors. For interdisciplinary submissions, reviewers are chosen from different fields represented in the article.

Review Criteria.
Reviewers assess submissions based on originality, methodological soundness, significance of findings, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards. Reviewers may recommend revisions, acceptance, or rejection.

Author Response.
Authors receive reviewer comments and are given an opportunity to address concerns, revise, and improve their manuscript accordingly.

Editorial Decision.
The editorial team, considering reviewer recommendations and authors' responses, makes final decisions on acceptance, revision, or rejection. The decision-making process is transparent and unbiased.

Manuscript Review Timelines
Our journal aims to provide efficient and timely reviews of submitted manuscripts.

The review process typically takes 30-40 days to complete.