Political Crimes: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of The Problem
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The article discusses one of the types of crimes, specifically political crimes. It emphasizes that the research remains relevant and significant in democratic countries. While conditions have been created in such countries to reduce the factors that lead to political crimes, the occurrence of such crimes has not been completely eliminated. The study aims to clarify the characteristics of contemporary political crimes. The author points out that despite the long history of research into this phenomenon, there is still no universally accepted definition for the concept of "political crime." In most definitions of political crime, these crimes are typically associated with the pursuit, maintenance, and use of power. The article focuses on the main issues that currently pique the interest of researchers analyzing political crimes, and it presents a classification based on the subjects and objects of these crimes.
Studying both the individuals who commit political crimes and their victims is crucial to understanding the specificities of these crimes. The article draws attention to the fact that labeling actions within the political sphere as "criminal" is contingent upon various factors, including systems of values, established norms and regulations, societal norms, and the influence of media on public awareness. Trust in authorities and their legitimacy also plays a role. Furthermore, the article presents models that demonstrate shifts in attitudes towards revolutions, uprisings, and the reassessment of actions that were once considered "criminal." These shifts can be attributed to changes in the political and social systems. The author highlights that these alterations could be linked to transformations in the political and social systems.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61439/ODPP6920
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Bhasin, T., & Gandhi, J. (2013). Timing and targeting of state repression in authoritarian elections. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.011
Bove, V. M., Platteau, J., & Sekeris, P. G. (2017). Political repression in autocratic regimes. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.11.004
Burmaoglu, S., & Sarıtas, O. (2017). Changing characteristics of warfare and the future of Military R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.062
Dochartaigh, N. Ó. (2015). Territorial conflicts. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 214–220). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.96039-2
Doyle, M. W. (2011). Liberal Peace: Selected Essays. Routledge.
Gooch, E. (2019). Terrain ruggedness and limits of political repression: Evidence from China’s Great Leap Forward and Famine (1959-61). Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(4), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2019.08.001
Hewitt, J. J., Wilkenfeld, J., & Gurr, T. R. (2010). Peace and conflict 2010: executive summary. Paradigm.
Kaplan, M. A. (2005). System and process in international politics. John Wiley and Sons.
Kindratets, O. N. (2012). Oligarchalization of the power: the causes and consequences. Gilea: Scientific Bulletin, 65, 476–481.
Lemke, D. (2008). Power Politics and Wars without States. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00342.x
Li, R., & Kovacich, G. L. (2016). Introduction to Global Information Warfare. In The Information Systems Security Officer’s Guide (3rd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802190-3.00013-0
Lombroso, C. (1978). Los anarquistas [The anarchists]. Júcar.
Lombroso, C., & Laschi, R. (1890). Il delitto politico e le rivoluzioni in rapporto al diritto, all’antropologia criminale ed alla scienza di governo: Con 10 tavole e 21 figure nel testo [Political crime and revolutions in relation to law, criminal anthropology and government science: With 10 tables and 21 figures in the text]. Fratelli Bocca.
Luneev, V. V. (1999). Politicheskaya prestupnost v Rossii: proshloe i nastoyashee [Political Crime in Russia: Past and Present]. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 5, 66–79.
Luneev, V. V. (2005). Prestupnost XX veka: mirovye, regionalnye i rossijskie tendencii [Criminality of the XX century: world, regional and Russian trends] (2nd ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Miller, C. (2019). Inside the information wars. New Scientist, 244(3252), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(19)31973-6
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. A.A. Knopf.
Passas, N. (1986). Political crime and political offender: Theory and practice. The Liverpool Law Review, 8(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01079483
Roberti, P. (2019). State capacity and repression: A model of colonial rule. European Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.01.007
Robinson, M., Jones, K., & Janicke, H. (2015). Cyber warfare: Issues and challenges. Computers & Security, 49, 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2014.11.007
Ross, J. I. (2012). An introduction to political crime. Policy.
Sætra, H. S. (2019). The tyranny of perceived opinion: Freedom and information in the era of big data. Technology in Society, 59, 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101155
Shafer, S. (1971). The Concept of the Political Criminal. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62(3), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142177
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008
Straub, J. (2019). Mutual assured destruction in information, influence and cyber warfare: Comparing, contrasting and combining relevant scenarios. Technology in Society, 59, 101177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101177
Stukas, A. A., & Snyder, M. (2016). Self-Fulfilling prophecies. In Encyclopedia of Mental Health (2nd ed., pp. 92–100). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-397045-9.00220-2
Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026
Tanner, C., Fishman, E. K., Horton, K. M., & Sheth, S. (2017). How technology is changing news and our culture: Lessons from Elections 2016 and Davos 2017: Tech, Media, and the Newsroom of the Future. Journal of the American College of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.025
Timoshenko, V. (2011). Politichni Zlochini yak Element Politichnogo Zhittya [Political crimes as an element of political life]. Actual Problems of State and Law: A Collection of Scientific Papers, 43, 174–179.
United Nations. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Van Voren, R. (2015). Fifty years of political abuse of psychiatry – no end in sight. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 1(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2014.12.001
Weber, M. (1904). Die "Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv Für Sozialwissenschaft Und Sozialpolitik, 19(1), 22–87.
Zelinska, N. A. (2005). Ponyatie "politicheskaya prestupnost" [Concept of "political crime"]. Actual Problems of State and Law: A Collection of Scientific Papers, 25, 491–497.