Theory of Social Change in Post-Soviet Ukrainian Society


Dr. Vladimir Skvorets


The significance of the issue lies in the observation that the experience of implementing neoliberal market reforms during the 1990s in Ukraine reveals that disregarding the contributions of Ukrainian scholars led to detrimental consequences for socio-economic transformations. This study focuses on the theories of social change developed by Ukrainian scholars. The aim of this article is to consolidate and structure the concepts put forth by Ukrainian scholars that contribute to the theory of social change within post-Soviet Ukrainian society.

The methodology employed to examine the theory of social change in the context of post-Soviet Ukrainian society encompasses systematic, logical, historical, dialectical, and civilizational approaches and techniques. The findings of the research indicate that the theory of social change necessitates an interdisciplinary methodology. The primary criterion for evaluating the nature of social change is its orientation toward upholding societal cohesion. The emergence of crisis phenomena that present challenges to society serves as an indicator of social change. An essential element in understanding social change is an awareness of the socio-cultural distinctiveness of a given society. Effective management of social processes relies on the integration of theoretical principles with practical applications.

Several domains have emerged in the evolution of the theory of social change within post-Soviet Ukrainian society, including economic, demographic, civilizational, political, and security-oriented aspects. An analysis of indigenous concepts of social change within post-Soviet Ukrainian society highlights certain characteristics. Ukrainian social researchers consistently grapple with the task of constructing a comprehensive perspective on Ukrainian society. Amidst the multitude of social changes, a central issue pertaining to various concepts of social change has gradually arisen—the examination of the trajectory that society follows. Notably, a significant portion of scholars, predominantly economists, have regarded the economy as the primary determinant shaping the nature of social change.

The practical significance of these findings resides in the synthesis and organization of the concepts formulated by Ukrainian scholars, which contribute to the framework of the theory of social change in the context of post-Soviet Ukrainian society.



Author Biography

Dr. Vladimir Skvorets, Zaporizhzhia National University

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology at Zaporizhzhya National University. Academician of the European Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Member of the Sociological Association of Ukraine. He is an author of 127 scientific and methodological publications, among them 3 monographs (one of them is collective), 7 manuals. He cooperates with representatives of public organizations that are engaged in the development of the debate movement in Ukraine (NGO "New Vision", Dnipro, "IDEA" and others).


Ahlqvist, T. (2022). An outline of future-oriented dialectics: Conceptualising dialectical positions, trajectories and processes in the context of futures research. Futures, 143, 103037.
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83.
Bartoszewicz, M. G., Eibl, O., & Ghamari, M. E. (2022). Securitising the future: Dystopian migration discourses in Poland and the Czech Republic. Futures, 141, 102972.
Becker, J. (2023). Artificial lives, analogies and symbolic thought: an anthropological insight on robots and AI. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 99, 89–96.
Beckert, J., & Suckert, L. (2021). The future as a social fact. The analysis of perceptions of the future in sociology. Poetics, 84, 101499.
Beytía, P., & Müller, H. (2022). Towards a digital reflexive sociology: using Wikipedia’s biographical repository as a reflexive tool. Poetics, 95, 101732.
Bilorus, O. G. (Ed.). (2001). Globalizaciya i bezpeka rozvitku: Monografiya [Globalization and security of development: Monograph]. Kyiv National Economic University.
Boustras, G., & Waring, A. (2020). Towards a reconceptualization of safety and security, their interactions, and policy requirements in a 21st century context. Safety Science, 132, 104942.
Brozović, D. (2023). Societal collapse: A literature review. Futures, 145, 103075.
Cavanagh, C. J. (2021). Limits to (de)growth: Theorizing ‘the dialectics of hatchet and seed’ in emergent socio-ecological transformations. Political Geography, 90, 102479.
Cheng, W. (2023). A political economy approach to endogenous industrial policies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 75, 103499.
Chernyak, V. (2020). To the Ukrainian people – a Stable Systematically Ustoichivoe Human Development (Assessment of Scientific and Administrative Support). Part I. The Overall Situation with the Strategic Planning of Human Development in Ukraine. Economic Herald of the Donbas, 1(59), 199–217.
Chumachenko, М. G., Amosha, O. I., & Lyashenko, V. І. (2009). Neoindustrialni shlyahi rozvitku nacionalnoyi ekonomiki Ukrayini ta regionalnoyi ekonomiki Donbasu [Neoindustrial ways of national Ukrainian and Donbass regional economical development]. Economic Herald of the Donbas, 4(22), 18–25.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2018). Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology. Technology in Society, 52, 4–9.
Da Cunha, I. F. (2018). Constructing dystopian experience: A Neurath-Cartwrightian approach to the philosophy of social technology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 72, 41–48.
De Lucas, F. M., & Prats, M. (2020). Why do some areas depopulate? The role of economic factors and local governments. Cities, 97, 102506.
Denisova‐Schmidt, E., & Prytula, Y. (2018). Business corruption in Ukraine: A way to get things done? Business Horizons, 61(6), 867–879.
Deng, Y. (2019). Construction of ideal model of social development under the political background of mind philosophy. Cognitive Systems Research, 57, 1–10.
Filipenko, A. S. (2010). Model narodnoyi ekonomiki dlya Ukrayini: osnovni risi [Model Of National Economy For Ukraine: The Basic Features]. Economic Annals-XXI, 3–4, 3–6.
Filippetti, A., & Vezzani, A. (2022). The political economy of public research, or why some governments commit to research more than others. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121482.
Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Pacheco, R. C. S. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Fruzzetti, A. E. (2022). Dialectical thinking. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 567–570.
Gladun, O. M. (2018). Narisi z demografichnoyi istoriyi Ukrayini ХХ stolittya [Essays on the demographic history of Ukraine in the twentieth century]. Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Gladun, O. M. (Ed.). (2019). The population of Ukraine. Demographic trends in Ukraine in 2002– 2019. Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Golovakha, Y., & Makeiev, S. (Eds.). (2022). Ukrayinske suspilstvo v umovah vijni. 2022: Kolektivna monografiya [Ukrainian society in wartime. 2022: Collective monograph]. Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Golovakha, Y., & Panina, N. (2006). Osnovnye etapy i tendencii transformacii ukrainskogo obshestva: ot perestrojki do «oranzhevoj revolyucii [Main Stages and Tendencies in Transformation of Ukrainian Society: From Perestroika to Orange Revolution]. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 3, 32–51.
Ghosh, O. (2004). Istorichna misiya politichnoyi ekonomiyi v Ukrayini [Historical mission of political economy in Ukraine]. Economy of Ukraine, 2, 50–59.
Hanson-DeFusco, J. (2023). What data counts in policymaking and programming evaluation – Relevant data sources for triangulation according to main epistemologies and philosophies within social science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102238.
Haeussler, C., & Sauermann, H. (2020). Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity. Research Policy, 49(6), 103987.
Hanto, J., Schroth, A., Krawielicki, L., Oei, P., & Burton, J. (2022). South Africa’s energy transition – Unraveling its political economy. Energy for Sustainable Development, 69, 164–178.
Heyets, V. M. (2009). Razvitie i krizisy v Ukraine – protivorechiya transformacii [Development and crises in Ukraine - contradictions of transformation]. In Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society. Collection of scientific works. (p. 342).
Heyets, V. M., Vyshnevsky, V., Lyashenko, V., Dmitrenko, M. K., Kurilov, I. O., Malyuk, А. M., Novak, I. M., Pakhomov, Y. M., Reznik, V. S., Pavliuk, K. V., Stepanov, O. V., Titova, O. M., Tkachenko, I. V., . . . Shapoval, Y. I. (2009). Socio-economic situation in Ukraine: consequences for the people and the state: national report (V. M. Heyets, E. Libanova, A. I. Danilenko, M. G. Zhulinsky, & O. S. Onishchenko, Eds.). NVC NBUV.
Heyets, V. M. (Ed.). (2012). Novij kurs: reformi v Ukrayini. 2010–2015. Nacionalna dopovid [New course: reforms in Ukraine. 2010–2015. National report]. NVC NBUV.
Hołyst, J. A. (2023). Why does history surprise us? Journal of Computational Science, 73, 102137.
Horbulin, V. P. (2017). The World Hybrid War: Ukrainian Forefront (Y. Lugovska, H. Krapivnyk, & R. Shultz, Trans.). Folio.
Howell, P. (2013). Afterword: remapping the terrain of moral regulation. Journal of Historical Geography, 42, 193–202.
Høyland, S. (2018). Exploring and modeling the societal safety and societal security concepts – A systematic review, empirical study and key implications. Safety Science, 110, 7–22.
Kendyukhov, O. V. (2009). Strategy of socio-economic development of Ukraine: purpose, tasks and key problems. Economy of Industry, 47, 4.
Kharlamova, G., Melnychuk, O., Antonyuk, L., Chala, N., Humenna, О., Radchuk, А., Shnyrkov, О., Stolyarchuk, Y., Taruta, S., Zhylinska, O., & Moscardini, А. (2018). Ukraine 2030: The Doctrine of Sustainable Development. ADEF-Ukraine.
Krause, M. (2019). What is Zeitgeist? Examining period-specific cultural patterns. Poetics, 76, 101352.
Krymsky, S. B., & Pavlenko, Y. V. (2007). Civilizational development of mankind. Feniks.
Kuzio, T. (2017). Ukrainian kleptocrats and America’s real-life House of Cards: Corruption, lobbyism and the rule of law. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 50(1), 29–40.
Larraz, B., & García-Gómez, E. (2020). Depopulation of Toledo’s historical centre in Spain? Challenge for local politics in world heritage cities. Cities, 105, 102841.
Lepskiy, M. A. (2012). Strategichne prognozuvannya politichnih situacij ta procesiv [Strategic forecasting of political situations and processes]. Zaporizhzhya National University.
L’Etang, J. (2014). Public relations and historical sociology: Historiography as reflexive critique. Public Relations Review, 40(4), 654–660.
Lindgreen, A., Di Benedetto, C. A., Brodie, R. J., & Van Der Borgh, M. (2020). How to undertake great cross-disciplinary research. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, A1–A5.
Lund, A., & Vestøl, J. M. (2020). An analytical unit of transformative agency: Dynamics and dialectics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100390.
Libanova, E. M. (2014). Demographic shifts in the context of social development. Demography and Social Economy, 1, 21.
Mahbubani, K. (2015). Can Singapore Survive? Straits Times Press Pte Ltd.
Makogon, Y. V. (2019). External economic potential of Ukraine in the Black Sea region. "Economic Bulletin of NTUU “KPI,” 15, 114–115.
Meijer, M., & Syssner, J. (2017). Getting ahead in depopulating areas - How linking social capital is used for informal planning practices in Sweden and The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 59–70.
Milakis, D., & Müller, S. (2021). The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: Towards a research agenda. Cities, 113, 103144.
Ming, X., MacLeod, M. a. J., & Van Der Veen, J. (2023). Construction and enactment of interdisciplinarity: A grounded theory case study in Liberal Arts and Sciences education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 40, 100716.
Naseemullah, A. (2023). The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform? World Development, 168, 106269.
Nilsen, M., Albrechtsen, E., & Nyheim, O. M. (2018). Changes in Norway’s societal safety and security measures following the 2011 Oslo terror attacks. Safety Science, 110, 59–68.
Onge, J. M. S., & Smith, S. (2020). Demographics in rural populations. Surgical Clinics of North America, 100(5), 823–833.
Osipian, A. L. (2017). University autonomy in Ukraine: Higher education corruption and the state. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 50(3), 233–243.
Pakhomov, Y. (2003). MVF: urok dlya Ukrainy. [The IMF: a lesson for Ukraine]. Economic Annals-XXI, 1, 3–10.
Pavlovsky, M. (2001a). Strategiya rozvitku suspilstva: Ukrayina i svit (ekonomika, politologiya, sociologiya) [Strategy of Society Development: Ukraine and the World (Economics, Political Science, Sociology)]. Tehnika.
Pavlovsky, M. (2001b). Stijkist ekonomichnoyi sistemi. Vid ritoriki do diyi [Sustainability of the economic system. From rhetoric to action]. Viche, 3, 108, 15-22.
Pyrozhkov, S. (2004). Demografichnij faktor u globalnij strategiyi rozvitku Ukrayini [Demographic factor in Ukraine’s global development strategy]. In Demography and social economy (Vol. 1, pp. 5–20).
Ryoo, J. J., & Crawford, J. (2023). Critical theory in qualitative research in education. In International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed., pp. 45–54).
Shnypko, O. (2011). Innovacijna Model Ekonomichnogo Rozvitku Ukrayini: Ekologichna Determinovanist [Innovative Model of Economic Development of Ukraine: Environmental Determinism]. Investytsiyi: Praktyka Ta Dosvid, 20, 4–6.
Shulga, M. (2010). Krizis kak ugroza obshestvennoj bezopasnosti [Crisis as a threat to public security]. In Kriza v Ukrayini: zona urazhennya. Poglyad sociologiv [The crisis in Ukraine: the affected area. The view of sociologists] (pp. 7-27). Drukarnya "Biznespoligraf".
Shulga, M. (2018). Zbij socialnoyi matrici [The failure of the social matrix]. Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Shulga, M. (2019). Suspilstvo z nadlishkom viklikiv [Society with an excess of challenges]. In Ukrainian society: monitoring of social changes. Collection of scientific papers. Issue 6 (20) (pp. 397–412). Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Shulga, M. O. (2011). Drejf na uzbichchya. Dvadcyat rokiv suspilnih zmin v Ukrayini [Drifting to the margins: twenty years of social change in Ukraine]. Drukarnya "Biznespoligraf."
Sirenko, V. F. (2009). Ukrayina urazhena sistemnoyu krizoyu vzhe 18 rokiv. Chi ye vihid? (Poglyad zliva) [Ukraine has been plagued by a systemic crisis for 18 years. Is there a way out? (Left view)]. Viche, 4, 28–34.
Skvorets, V. O. (2019). Transformation of the socio-historical organism of Ukraine: analysis of social processes. Zaporizhzhya National University.
Sohan, L. (1966). Duhovnyj progress lichnosti i kommunizm [Spiritual progress of the individual and communism]. Naukova dumka.
Soskin, O. I. (2010). Transformaciya socioistorichnogo organizmu Ukrayini: analitika socialnih procesiv [Formation of the institutional basis of the economic model of Ukraine]. Galician Economic Journal, 2, 27, 53-60.
Soskin, O. I. (2013). National capitalism: the economic model for Ukraine. IST.
Sztompka, P. (1993). The Sociology of Social Change. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tancher, V. V., & Stepanenko, V. P. (Eds.). (2004). Social transformation: conceptualization, trends, Ukrainian experience. Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Tarasevych, V. (2011). Ideological doctrines: civilizational aspects and national flavor. Economy of Ukraine, 3, 12–13.
Teichmann, F., Falker, M., & Sergi, B. S. (2020). Extractive industries, corruption and potential solutions. The case of Ukraine. Resources Policy, 69, 101844.
The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine liquidated the Institute of World Economy. (2013, November 11). Tyzhden.
Treich, N., & Yang, Y. (2021). Public safety under imperfect taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 106, 102421.
Vaishar, A., Šťastná, M., Zapletalová, J., & Nováková, E. (2020). Is the European countryside depopulating? Case study Moravia. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 567–577.
Volovik, V. I. (2006). Filosofiya politicheskogo soznaniya [The philosophy of the political consciousness]. Prosvita.
Vorona, V. M., Shulga, M. O., Bekeshkina, I., Tarasenko, V., Sakada, M., Vyshniak, O., Soboleva, N., Matusevych, V., Lavrynenko, N., Kazakov, V., Zotkin, A., Reznik, O., Nikitina, T., Liubyva, T., Dembytsky, S., Stepanenko, V., . . . Zhuleniova, O. (2013). Ukrainian society 1992-2013. State and dynamics of changes. Sociological monitoring (V. M. Vorona & M. O. Shulga, Eds.; 6th ed.). Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Vorona, V. M., Shulga, M. O., Zlobina, O., Kostenko, N., Reznik, O., Chepurko, H., Ruchka, A., Pribytkova, I., Kostenko, N., Dembitskyi, S., Burlachuk, V., Bevzenko, L., Pylypenko, V., Shulga, O., Rakhmanov, O., Ivashchenko, K., Burova, O., . . . Lavrinenko, N. (2019). Ukrainian society: monitoring of social changes. Collection of scientific papers. (V. M. Vorona & M. O. Shulga, Eds.; 6th ed.). Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Vorotina, L. I. (2013). Socialna transformaciya malogo biznesu v Ukrayini [Social transformation of small business in Ukraine]. Theoretical and Applied Issues of Economics., 28(1), 69–76.
Vyshnevsky, V. P., & Dementiev, V. V. (2011). Industrialpolicyfor Ukraine: Theoretical Aspects. Economic Herald of the Donbas, 4(26), 5–20.
Warczok, T., & Beyer, S. (2021). The logic of knowledge production: Power structures and symbolic divisions in the elite field of American sociology. Poetics, 87, 101531.
Yew, L. K. (2000). From Third World to First: The Singapore Story, 1965-2000. Harper.
Zagorodniuk, T. (2013). Koncepcii postsovetskoj transformacii obshestva T.I.Zaslavskoj i N.V.Paninoj [Concepts of Post-Soviet Transformation of Society by T.I. Zaslavskaya and N.V. Panina]. Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Zhu, M., Chaturvedi, V., Clarke, L., Hochstetler, K., Hultman, N., Vogt-Schilb, A., & Wang, P. (2023). Bridging the global stocktake gap of climate mitigation: A framework to measure political economy progress. One Earth, 6(9), 1104–1130.
Zaloznaya, M., Reisinger, W. M., & Claypool, V. H. (2018). When civil engagement is part of the problem: Flawed anti-corruptionism in Russia and Ukraine. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 51(3), 245–255.